The Chronicles of Narnia:
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Directed by Andrew Adamson, 2005
Cast: Georgie Henley, Skandar Keynes, William Moseley,
Anna Popplewell, Tilda Stilton, James McAvoy
By Kathryn Atwood
SPOILER ALERT: The following review reveals
key plot details.
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
opens a door into a visually stunning fantasy world, a cinematic masterpiece
that leaves all other previous Narnian book-to-film attempts in the
dusty mothballs of the wardrobe. The film remains largely true to C.S.
Lewis' original story, fleshing out the tale by expanding angles of
the story that its author merely touched on, while shifting emphases
in such a way that, depending on your point of view, either add a welcome
depth to the story or take it in an entirely different direction.
For instance, there's the real world setting. In the second sentence
of his tale, Lewis explains that the Narnian adventures of the four
Pevensie children, Peter, Susan, Edmund and Lucy, began "when they
were sent away from London during the war because of the air raids."
After that, the real war ravaging England isn't mentioned and doesn't
have much effect on choices of the characters or the outcome of the
story.
However, when director Andrew Adamson opens the film with a gray London
sky highlighted with searchlights, and the camera pans momentarily to
the inside of a Nazi bomber, it's clear that the war is going to figure
very significantly into this retelling. It has a particularly key role
in expanding the tale's key conflict between brothers Edmund and Peter.
In the book, this is caused simply by diametric personalities: younger
Edmund has a nasty streak that, at one point, completely angers the
more upright Peter, who chides his brother for being a "poisonous
little beast."
This conflict helps lead Edmund into the witch's sleigh, where he gorges
himself on her enchanted candy and leads him to lie, thus becoming a
traitor to all that is good in Narnia, including his own siblings.
This clash is deepened substantially in the film by connecting it to
the war in Europe, making Edmund a more complex, sympathetic and believable
character than his original characterization. During the film's opening
air raid, when Edmund runs from the safety of the bomb shelter into
his about-to-be-bombed London house to retrieve a photo of their soldier
father, Peter chides him loudly for taking such a foolish risk. Edmund,
who obviously misses his father, absolutely refuses to accept Peter's
repeated attempts to take on a paternal role among the children, ultimately
leading Edmund to another albeit treacherous authority
figure.
The subject of personal choice, expanded significantly in the film,
is also tightly connected to the war in Europe. Peter, given specific
instructions by his mother to "look after the others" in the
early, tearful train station scene, takes his role quite seriously,
which not only causes friction with Edmund, but also a reluctance with
all the children to get involved in the Narnian battle. Although Lewis'
Peter had no problem accepting his role as the leader of Aslan's armies
and future high king of Narnia, the film's Peter is constantly battling
self-doubt ("Aslan, I'm not who you think I am") which is
increased by the thoughts of real war-related responsibility flying
around in his head, echoed by the always-wet blanket Susan. Lewis most
definitely gave her that character, but screenwriter Ann Peacock pulls
out all the stops with this line, "just because some man in a red
coat [Narnia's 'Father Christmas'] gave you a sword, it doesn't make
you a hero," she calls out, encouraging Peter to surrender to the
witch's wolves instead of fighting them with his new weapon. That's
some wet blanket! Thankfully, Peter doesn't listen to her but instead
uses his sword to hold fast to piece of ice, thus saving both himself
and his sisters from the wolves' clutches and death by drowning, as
the frozen river they are standing on and all Narnia is
becoming released from the witch's eternal winter by the spring-inducing
presence of Aslan.
This ice flow shot not part of the original story and filmed
in a grand total of four different countries would be quite easy
for a literature purist to dismiss as a completely gratuitous action
scene. But aside from being really, really cool (I never said I was
completely immune to gratuitous action scenes), it provides Peter's
character with an obvious chance for growth. Instead of killing the
wolves with his sword right there, he takes a smaller albeit
visually dramatic step in the direction the story is taking him.
This interim choice makes him seem a more realistic character and makes
his ultimate triumph over the wolf, the forces of the witch and his
own self-doubt more believable than Lewis' original high king, who,
as has been pointed out, seemed to have no problem taking the gargantuan
step from English school boy to royal military leader.
After Edmund is rescued from the witch and the children must decide
whether or not to provide leadership for the Narnia armies, Peter finally
decides that he must go on alone in Narnia while the others return to
the relative safety of the English countryside, telling them: "I
promised Mum I'd keep you three safe." When the four of them resolve,
of course, to battle the forces of evil together on the Narnian side
of the wardrobe, Edmund completely heals the fraternal rift while sweeping
away the last vestiges of Peter's self-doubt with this great Ann Peacock
line: "Aslan believed in you... and so do I."
Thus united, the two brothers go out to lead a battle that was descriptively
breezed over by Lewis but is given the royal treatment by Adamson. It's
obvious that the Weta Workshop of The Lord of the Rings fame
(among nine other special effects companies) had a hand in the dazzling
visual effects of this sequence, but while the battles scenes in the
LOTR films had a duskiness to them, this battle, serious and
climactic though it is, is rendered in stunning living color, making
it look very much like what it is: the climactic battle of a children's
story. Yes, good guys die and heads roll, but for the most part, they're
done in by being turned from flesh and blood to stone by the witch's
wand, so that the vivid colors of the battle are limited to the bright
standards and armor of Aslan's army and the shiny hues of the summer
day in which it takes place.
From the moment the mail-clad Peter gives the signal to charge until
Aslan demolishes the witch (off camera, of course), this is the most
visually stunning sequence of the film and alone is worth the price
of a ticket (or a DVD for that matter).
The film, has, in my opinion, only one major misstep, and that would
be in the delineation of Aslan's character. His presence is supposed
to be awe-inspiring, as Lewis' Mrs. Beaver explains to the children
upon their entering Narnia: "If there's anyone that can appear
before Aslan without their knees knocking, they're either braver than
most or else just plain silly." He possesses an innate moral authority
that makes witches cower and good children hesitate. Peacock's Aslan,
although visually gorgeous and fairly well-voiced by Liam Neeson (although
I often found myself expecting him to initiate a discussion of midichlorians),
inspires fear in no one. The children, instead of wavering upon their
first meeting with him (as Lewis' Pevensies did), walk right up to him
and, instead of tentatively asking him his bidding, boldly ask him for
help.
The talented Tilda Swinton gives a fine portrayal of the winter-hearted
witch, but there are some major missteps in the delineation of her relationship
with Aslan which make the authority issue of the tale quite lopsided.
She is supposed to nearly die of fright upon seeing her resurrected
enemy suddenly appear on the battlefield, but at this point in the film,
Swinton merely glances at Aslan and momentarily expresses some surprise
before determinedly continuing her sword fight with Peter.
When Aslan is standing on top of her, she is finally forced to drop
her sword, but as she looks up into her enemy's face, her own features
don't register an iota of fear, which is really quite unbelievable,
even for a fantasy.
Her film character possesses more authority and inspires much more
fearful respect among the other characters than the supposedly daunting
lion. He ultimately defeats her only because he's bigger and has teeth
and claws.
Apparently, there was some real fear among the film's creators that
giving Aslan as much moral authority as Lewis originally intended might
offend potential audiences who weren't too keen on the book's obvious
Christian outlook. Lewis readily admitted than Aslan was a Christ figure,
so much so that he repeatedly resisted filmic renderings of his books,
calling the idea "blasphemous." Aside from the self-sacrifice
and resurrection of Aslan, the Christ-like qualities Lewis gave him
are virtually absent from this film. His character is not central here
as it is in the story; rather, the screenplay has shifted the focus
from the great lion to the choices of the other characters. This makes
it a more inspiring story in some respects but at the same time, an
opportunity to cinematically portray a great character of children's
literature has been lost, or at the very least, significantly watered
down. (The poor cousins of this film, the 1979 cartoon and the 1988
live-action version, because they both were very true to the book, are
very accurate in their characterization of Aslan, but in the former,
the great lion is a Saturday morning cartoon character and in the latter,
a very clumsy puppet whose words don't sync with his mouth.)
Anyone well familiar with J.R.R. Tolkien's characters knows that Andrew
Adamson is not the first director guilty of this kind of character rewriting
but after all, Adamson and Peter Jackson were both trying, first and
foremost, to make profitable films, not necessarily pure literary adaptations.
Those not intimately familiar with the original story or characters,
however, will find little cause for disappointment in this gorgeous
film.
It has succeeded in making the beauties of Narnia come to life in a
way that has never before been seen on film. The most cynical movie-goers
will no doubt find themselves, after the show, searching through old
wardrobes for a glimpse of that magical land called Narnia.
|